Appearance
question:You are an AI assistant. You will be given a task. You must generate a detailed and long answer. Based on the premise "okay you said you're Judy", can we conclude the hypothesis "You said you are John." is true (see options)? Select from the following. * yes * it is not possible to tell * no
answer:It is not possible to tell. Based on the given premise, "Okay, you said you're Judy," we cannot conclusively determine if the hypothesis "You said you are John" is true or false. The premise only provides information about an individual stating that they are Judy. There is no information about someone being John or if the individual who said they are Judy also said they are John. It may be the case that the speaker has only identified themselves as Judy, implying that the hypothesis is false, but without further context, we cannot make a definitive conclusion. Therefore, it is not possible to tell if the hypothesis is true based on the given premise.
question:Explain how you used the definition to come up with the answer. Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you need to reverse the order of words in the given sentence. Sentence: the fried dough is on a plate next to small bananas
answer:Using the definition, the sentence can be broken down to individual words which are then reorganized in reverse order. This involves taking the last word of the sentence and making it the first, and then continuing in this manner until the original first word of the sentence is now the last word. In this particular example, the sentence "the fried dough is on a plate next to small bananas" is reversed to become "bananas small to next plate a on is dough fried the".
question:You are an AI assistant. Provide a detailed answer so user don’t need to search outside to understand the answer. Q:Read the article and select the best answer. Article: We live in a sweet world. The average American kid consumes more than 20 teaspoons of sugar per day, and adults eat 50% more sugar today than they did in the 1970s. We all know that too much sugar isn't good for you. But did we know it could be dangerous? A team of researchers at the University of Utah used mice to conduct a study on the negative effects of sugar. They found it could have serious effects on people's health. Sugar is found not only in sweets and candies, but also in many household items like pasta and crackers. During the 58-week-long study, mice were fed a diet containing 25% more sugar. This percentage equals a healthy human diet along with three cans of soda daily. The team found that these mice were twice as likely to die as mice fed a similar diet without the sugar. Though the mice did not show signs of obesity or high blood pressure, male mice were 26% less territorial and produced 25% fewer offspring than the other mice. Scientists often use mice for research because they have a similar genetic structure to humans. "Since most substances that are dangerous in mice are also dangerous in people, it's likely that those physical problems that cause those mice to have increased deaths also work in people," says study author James Ruff of the University of Utah. Findings from this study reveal negative effects that are not as noticeable as weight gain or heart problems. Sugar can contribute to long-term changes in the body that can change development and even shorten lives. Cutting sugar out of the American diet altogether may be difficult. But making the effort to control our nation's sugar desire will provide for a truly sweeter future. Question: From the passage we can infer _ Options: A: sugar plays a very important role in Americans' diet B: kids consume more sugar than adults in America C: the study on human beings lasted 58 weeks D: the genetic structure of mice is totally different from that of people A:
answer:sugar plays a very important role in Americans' diet
question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Detailed Instructions: Given two noun phrases (arguments) and relationship between them, form a sentence that expresses theses arguments with the given relationship. Q: Relationship: 'be bear in', Argument/Subject 1: 'brook', Argument/Subject 2: 'topeka' A:
answer:Step 1: Determine the structure of the sentence Since the relationship given is 'be bear in', I need to form a sentence that clearly shows that one argument is contained within the other. In this case, it means that the 'brook' is found within 'Topeka'. Step 2: Identify the main verb and subject The main verb is 'be' and the subject is 'brook'. The object will be the second argument, 'Topeka'. Step 3: Include the relationship to complete the sentence Now I need to combine the verb, subject, object, and relationship to form the sentence. In this case, I will modify the verb 'be' to 'is' to match the singular subject 'brook'. And with 'bear in', I will change it to 'located in' to make sure it fits the meaning of containing one argument within the other. Step 4: Put it all together So the final sentence, expressing the relationship between the two arguments is: "The brook is located in Topeka."