Appearance
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Claim: "There is no character named Lucy on I Love Lucy." Is the claim above correct, and can it be verified by human common sense and without a web search? Options: - yes - no Step-by-step reasoning process:
answer:1. Consider the claim: "There is no character named Lucy on I Love Lucy." 2. Recall the basic premise of the show: "I Love Lucy" is a classic American sitcom that aired from 1951 to 1957, starring Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz. 3. Remember that Lucille Ball's character on the show is named Lucy Ricardo. 4. Recognize that the character Lucy Ricardo has the name "Lucy" in it. 5. Conclude that the claim is incorrect, as there is a character named Lucy on "I Love Lucy." Answer: no
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Chain-of-thought: The police are not paid for their services by private citizens. Question: Of the below sentences, which one does *not* make sense? Options: - Sentence A: "you will find a payment counter in a bank" - Sentence B: "you will find a payment counter in a police station" Answer: Sentence B Chain-of-thought: People expect other to be punctual for appointments. Question: Which of the following two sentences does not make sense? Options: - Sentence A: "If you have an appointment with someone else, you mustn't be punctual." - Sentence B: "If you have an appointment with someone else, you must be punctual." Answer: Sentence A Chain-of-thought: The bedroom is a good place to sleep. Question: Pick which sentence is not logical. Options: - Sentence A: "The bedroom is a good place to sleep." - Sentence B: "The bedroom is a good place to cook." Answer: Sentence B Chain-of-thought: A dog is an animal and not a vehicle.
answer:Question: Which of these sentences is not accurate? Options: - Sentence A: "A dog is a loyal pet." - Sentence B: "A dog is a mode of transportation." Answer: Sentence B
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Which of the following two sentences does not make sense? Options: - Sentence A: "Mom put baby into the stroller to walk to the park" - Sentence B: "Mom put the baby down the water slide to walk to the park" Let me think hard. Detailed solution:
answer:To determine which of the two sentences does not make sense, let's analyze them step-by-step and consider the context and actions described. Sentence A: "Mom put baby into the stroller to walk to the park" Step 1: Mom puts the baby into the stroller. Step 2: Mom walks to the park with the baby in the stroller. In this sentence, the actions are logical and appropriate for the context. Mothers often use strollers to transport babies while walking to a location, like a park. Sentence B: "Mom put the baby down the water slide to walk to the park" Step 1: Mom puts the baby down the water slide. Step 2: Mom walks to the park. In this sentence, the actions do not make sense in the context. Putting a baby down a water slide is not a safe or appropriate method of transporting a baby to the park. This action seems disconnected from the goal of walking to the park. Conclusion: Sentence B does not make sense, as it describes an unsafe and illogical action for transporting a baby to the park.
question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. [QUESTION] Given the sentence "Two cheerleaders leaping and waving yellow pompoms." can we conclude that "Two cheerleaders are cheering very enthusiastically."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Leaping and waving yellow pompoms is a way of cheering very enthusiastically. The answer is yes. [QUESTION] Given the sentence "Five young girls wearing headbands sitting on park bench." is it true that "The girls are playing basketball at the park."? The girls can't be sitting on a park bench and playing basketball at the same time. The answer is no. [QUESTION] Premise: "A football player runs with a ball." Hypothesis: "Chased by the opposing team." Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise? A running back is about to score on the two point conversion. The answer is yes. [QUESTION] Premise: "Thre is a shot of man with his back turned in a city." Hypothesis: "A man faces away from a city." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no
answer:The premise states that there is a shot of a man with his back turned in a city, which implies that the man is facing away from the camera, and the city is visible in the background. The hypothesis states that a man faces away from a city, which could mean that he is facing towards the camera or something else, but not necessarily the city itself. Given the information provided in the premise, we cannot definitively conclude that the man is facing away from the city itself. The answer is: it is not possible to tell.