Aurora

🔍

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. [QUESTION] Premise: "A little girl is laying on her tummy on the floor coloring on a large white sheet of paper." Hypothesis: "A politician is drawing up a new appropriations bill in his office." Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no A little girl is laying on the floor coloring so she is home not in an office. The answer is no. Q: Can we conclude from "A small boy rubbing his eyes." that "A small boy is rubbing his eyes because the wind blew some dust into them."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell A: Rubbing eyes does not imply it is because the wind blew some dust into them. The answer is it is not possible to tell. QUESTION: Given the sentence "Couples are seated on a boat on a river." is it true that "The river is dried out and he boat is empty."? Let's solve it slowly: The boat cannot have a couple in it and also be empty. The answer is no. [QUESTION] Given the sentence "A man in a yellow helmet riding his bike on a trail through the woods." can we conclude that "A man drinking tea."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no Riding a bike on a trail through the woods would not be conducive to drinking tea. The answer is no. Q: If "A man in long plaid shorts and a easter hat carrying a black bookbag walks with a heavyset woman with pink hair and wearing a hippie style dress walk away from the camera following many other similarly dressed people." does that mean that "A man in shorts is carrying a book bag."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no A: A man in long plaid shorts carrying a black bag with heavy set women. The answer is yes. [QUESTION] If "Two siblings pouting in time out." does that mean that "Two siblings eat candy as a reward."? Options: - yes - it is not possible to tell - no

answer:Two siblings pouting in time out implies they are being disciplined, not rewarded. The answer is no.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. **Q** Claim: "Atlantic cod exists in all oceans." Is the claim above correct, and can it be verified by human common sense and without a web search? Options: - yes - no **A** no Atlantic cod exists in only some regions of the world. "The Oncilla lives in South America and is classified as a mammal." Is the above claim true? Options: - yes - no yes Oncillas are mammals native to Brazil, Peru, Bolivia and other south American countries. **Q** Is the following sentence factually correct? "Eyes are one of the many sensory organs found on a variety of animals." Options: - yes - no **A** yes Eyes are indeed sensory organs and most animals have a lot of sensory organs, including eyes. Is the following statement true? "Slash plays the guitar on numerous albums." yes Slash (musician) played guitar on many songs and records in rock history. **Q** Is the following statement true? "Sometimes a Jury can be wrong." **A** yes There are many articles of prisoners being wrongfully convicted. **Q** Claim: "Led Zeppelin featured famous tracks as Good Times Bad Times, Dazed and Confused and Communication Breakdown in London." Is the claim above correct, and can it be verified by human common sense and without a web search? Options: - yes - no **A**

answer:yes Led Zeppelin is a well-known British rock band and the tracks mentioned are some of their famous songs, so it is reasonable to assume they played these tracks in London.

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. My question: Does the following sentence make sense? "Haakon VII of Norway skipped down the river near his home every other day." Options: - yes - no Please think gradually:

answer:To determine if the sentence makes sense, let's break it down step by step: 1. "Haakon VII of Norway": Haakon VII was a real person, who was the King of Norway from 1905 to 1957. So, this part of the sentence makes sense. 2. "skipped down the river": The verb "skipped" typically means to move lightly and quickly, making little jumps. While it is possible for a person to skip, it would be unusual and physically challenging to skip down a river, as rivers usually have water and an uneven terrain. Thus, this part of the sentence is questionable in terms of making sense. 3. "near his home": This part of the sentence is reasonable, as it is possible for someone to live near a river. 4. "every other day": This phrase means that the action occurred regularly, with one day between each occurrence. It is plausible for someone to have a routine that they follow every other day. Taking all these points into consideration, the sentence appears to be a mix of sensible and nonsensical elements. The reference to Haakon VII and the location near his home are reasonable, but the action of "skipping down the river" is improbable and doesn't make much sense. Hence, the answer is: - no

question:You are an AI assistant that helps people find information. User will you give you a question. Your task is to answer as faithfully as you can. While answering think step-by-step and justify your answer. Can we conclude from "A man in a plaid shirt and suit coat has a microphone in one hand and a pen in the other." that "The man is using the mic to give a speech."? Options: - yes - no - it is not possible to tell Step by step answer:

answer:1. We have the information that "A man in a plaid shirt and suit coat has a microphone in one hand and a pen in the other." 2. We need to determine if we can conclude that "The man is using the mic to give a speech." 3. The information provided tells us that the man has a microphone in his hand, which is often used for speaking purposes. 4. However, it does not explicitly state that the man is giving a speech or using the microphone for that purpose. 5. Therefore, it is not possible to tell if "The man is using the mic to give a speech" based solely on the provided information.